Index of Section 5 Manual Pages
| Interix / SUA | rcsintro.5 | Interix / SUA |
rcsintro(5) rcsintro(5)
rcsintro
NAME
rcsintro - introduction to Revision Control System (RCS) commands
DESCRIPTION
The Revision Control System (RCS) manages multiple revisions of files. RCS
automates the storing, retrieval, logging, identification, and merging of
revisions. RCS is useful for text that is revised frequently, for example
programs, documentation, graphics, papers, and form letters. The basic
user interface is extremely simple. The novice only needs to learn two
commands: ci(1) and co(1). The ci(1) command (ci being an abbreviation for
check in) deposits the contents of a file into an archival file called an
RCS file. An RCS file contains all revisions of a particular file. The
co(1) command (co being an abbreviation for check out) retrieves revisions
from an RCS file.
Functions of RCS
* Store and retrieve multiple revisions of text. RCS saves all old
revisions in a space-efficient way. Changes no longer destroy the
original because the previous revisions remain accessible. Revisions
can be retrieved according to ranges of revision numbers, symbolic
names, dates, authors, and states.
* Maintain a complete history of changes. RCS logs all changes
automatically. In addition to storing the text of each revision, RCS
also stores the author, the date and time of check-in, and a log
message summarizing the change. The logging makes it easy to find
out what happened to a module without having to compare source
listings or having to track down colleagues.
* Resolve access conflicts. When two or more programmers want to
modify the same revision, RCS alerts the programmers and prevents
one modification from corrupting the other.
* Maintain a tree of revisions. RCS can maintain separate lines of
development for each module. It stores a tree structure that
represents the ancestral relationships among revisions.
* Merge revisions and resolve conflicts. Two separate lines of
development of a module can be coalesced by merging. If the
revisions to be merged affect the same sections of code, RCS alerts
the user about the overlapping changes.
* Control releases and configurations. Revisions can be assigned
symbolic names and marked as released, stable, experimental, and so
on. With these facilities, configurations of modules can be
described simply and directly.
* Automatically identify each revision with name, revision number,
creation time, author, and so on. The identification is like a stamp
that can be embedded at an appropriate place in the text of a
revision. The identification makes it simple to determine which
revisions of which modules make up a given configuration.
* Minimize secondary storage. RCS needs little extra space for the
revisions (only the differences). If intermediate revisions are
deleted, the corresponding deltas are compressed accordingly.
Getting started with RCS
For the purposes of illustration, suppose you have a file f.c that you
want to put under control of RCS. If you have not already done so, make an
RCS directory with the following command:
mkdir RCS
Then invoke the check-in command:
ci f.c
This command creates an RCS file in the RCS directory, stores f.c into it
as revision 1.1, and deletes f.c. It also asks you for a description. The
description should be a synopsis of the contents of the file. All later
check-in commands will ask you for a log entry, which should summarize the
changes that you made.
Files in the RCS directory are called RCS files; the others are called
working files. To get back the working file f.c in the previous example,
use the check-out command:
co f.c
This command extracts the latest revision from the RCS file and writes it
into f.c. If you want to edit f.c, you must lock it as you check it out
with the command:
co -l f.c
You can now edit f.c.
If, after some editing, you want to see the differences between the
changes you have just made and the previously checked-in version, use the
command:
rcsdiff f.c
You can check the file back in by invoking:
ci f.c
This increments the revision number properly.
If ci gives you the message
ci error: no lock set by your_name,
it means that you have tried to check in a file even though you did not
lock it when you checked it out. At this point, it is too late to do the
check-out with locking because another check-out would overwrite your
modifications. Instead, invoke:
rcs -l f.c
This command will lock the latest revision for you, unless another user
has already done so, in which case you would have to negotiate with that
person.
Locking ensures that only you can check in the next update and prevents
problems that can arise if several people work on the same file. Even if a
revision is locked, it can still be checked out for reading, compiling,
and so on. Locking only prevents a check-in by anybody but the locker.
If your RCS file is private (that is, if you are the only person who is
going to deposit revisions into it) strict locking is not needed, and you
can turn it off. If strict locking is turned off, the owner of the RCS
file need not have a lock for check-in; all others still do. You turn
strict locking off and on with the commands:
rcs -U f.c
and
rcs -L f.c
If you do not want to clutter your working directory with RCS files,
create a subdirectory called RCS in your working directory, and move all
your RCS files there. RCS commands will look first into that directory to
find needed files. All the commands discussed above will still work
without any modification. (Actually, pairs of RCS and working files can be
specified in three ways: (a) both are given; (b) only the working file is
given; (c) only the RCS file is given. Both RCS and working files can have
arbitrary path prefixes; RCS commands pair them up intelligently.)
To avoid the deletion of the working file during check-in (in case you
want to continue editing or compiling), invoke:
ci -l f.c
or
ci -u f.c
These commands check in f.c as usual, but perform an implicit check-out.
The first form also locks the checked-in revision, the second one does
not. Thus, these options save you one check-out operation. The first form
is useful if you want to continue editing, and the second one is useful if
you just want to read the file. Both update the identification markers in
your working file (see later in this topic).
You can give ci the number you want assigned to a checked-in revision.
Assume all your revisions were numbered 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, and so on, and you
would like to start release 2. The following command:
ci -r2 f.c
or
ci -r2.1 f.c
assigns the number 2.1 to the new revision. Thereafter, ci will number the
subsequent revisions with 2.2, 2.3, and so on. The corresponding co
commands:
co -r2 f.c
and
co -r2.1 f.c
retrieve the latest revision numbered 2.x and the revision 2.1,
respectively. Using co without a revision number selects the latest
revision on the trunk; that is, the highest revision with a number
consisting of two fields. Numbers with more than two fields are needed for
branches. For example, to start a branch at revision 1.3, invoke:
ci -r1.3.1 f.c
This command starts a branch numbered 1 at revision 1.3 and assigns the
number 1.3.1.1 to the new revision. For more information about branches,
see rcsfile(5).
Automatic identification
RCS can put special strings for identification into your source and object
code. To obtain such identification, place the marker:
$Id$
into your text; for instance, inside a comment. RCS will replace this
marker with a string of the form:
$Id: file-name revision date time author state $
With such a marker on the first page of each module, you can always see
with which revision you are working. RCS keeps the markers up to date
automatically. To propagate the markers into your object code, simply put
them into literal character strings. In C, this is done as follows:
static char rcsid[] = "$Id$";
The command ident extracts such markers from any file, even object code
and dumps. Thus, ident lets you find out which revisions of which modules
were used in a given program.
It can also be useful to put the marker $Log$ into your text, inside a
comment. This marker accumulates the log messages that are requested
during check-in. Thus, you can maintain the complete history of your file
directly inside it. There are several additional identification markers;
see
co(1)
for details.
IDENTIFICATION
Author: Walter F. Tichy.
Manual Page Revision: 1.1; Release Date: 1996/08/12.
Copyright (C) 1982, 1988, 1989 Walter F. Tichy.
Copyright (C) 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993 Paul Eggert.
SEE ALSO
rcsfile(5)
ci(1)
co(1)
ident(1)
rcs(1)
rcsdiff(1)
rcsmerge(1)
rlog(1)
"RCS—A System for Version Control," Walter F. Tichy, Software—Practice &
Experience 15, 7 (July 1985), 637-654.